logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.12.04 2014고정1858
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

No one shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles, and the owner or employee of a business establishment banned from access by and employing juveniles shall verify the age of persons who have access to the business establishment and prohibit juveniles from accessing the business establishment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was working as an employee at the “Dsing shop” in the operation of the Defendant’s Dasing shop in Seongbuk-gu B and the 1st underground level. On June 21, 2014, the Defendant, at around 23:50, did not confirm the age of the juvenile E (the age of 16) and F (the age of 17) who had been employed by the said main place, which is a business establishment banned from allowing juveniles to enter and leave the said main place, and sold the 8-child disease, which is a drug harmful to juveniles, to the said juveniles to the said juveniles in the aggregate of 5,00 won, along with the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation and control of a business place;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs and business registration certificates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 59 subparagraph 8 and 29 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles who have the option of punishment (a point of access to establishments banned from employing juveniles) and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (a point of sale of drugs harmful to juveniles), the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) committed the instant crime within a short time despite having received a suspended sentence due to the same kind of crime, the Defendant appears to have an attitude to recognize and reflect the error, or even if considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant sufficiently, it is difficult to reduce the amount of fine under the summary order, so the sentence is determined as per Disposition.

arrow