logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.07 2013가단88290
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant's 6,048,326 won to the plaintiff A, 16,719,987 won to the plaintiff B, and 5,22,852 won to the plaintiff C and each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A cultivated each of the field of spaw from e, Plaintiff B, and C in e, P, P, and the Defendant sold agricultural chemicals, etc. in the name of “G” in e, P, P, P, P, and the Defendant sold agricultural chemicals, etc. in e, P,

B. On July 2013, the Plaintiffs asked the Defendant of the fertilizers, etc. to be used in the fields cultivated by the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs recommended the Plaintiffs to purchase the instant pesticide from the Defendant, on the recommendation of the Defendant of three kinds of UA-100 U.S. fertilizer (hereinafter “the combination of the foregoing fertilizers”) comprising the name of the goods of the Plaintiffs, such as the Yellow Spanish Mar, 1, 200, and the FA-100.

C. Around July 5, 2013, Plaintiff B mixed the above “sule” and two agricultural chemicals purchased from the Defendant with water around 1,000 liters, and spread them to the field of field of field. Plaintiff A purchased from the Defendant around 250 liter on July 9, 2013 by mixing them with the above “sule”, “cella”, “FA-100” and spread them to the field of field of field of field. Plaintiff C purchased from the Defendant around 50 liter of water on July 11, 2013 by mixing them with the above “sule”, “hem”, “FA-100” and “FA-100, and then spraying them into the dry field of field of field of dry field of dry field of dry field of dry field of dry field (hereinafter “the dry field of dry field of dry field of dry field of this case”). Plaintiff C spreaded to the Plaintiffs thereafter.

On the other hand, the method of using "sule" is used by dilution with water of 500 to 800 litres per disease, dilution with water of 400 to 700 litres per disease, and the method of using "FA-100" is stated to be used by dilution with water of 500 litres per disease.

Grounds for recognition: A1-1 to 3, A2-1, 2, A7-1 to 3, A8, B 1-1 to 3, and witness H

2. Determination

A. In full view of the statements in evidence Nos. 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 17-1 through 3, 17-9, and witness I and H’s testimony, the Defendant et al. sells the instant pesticide to the Plaintiffs, etc., and sell the instant pesticide in water 500 liters, “cella,” and “FA-100” pesticide disease.

arrow