logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.12 2013고단966
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case (Seoul District Court Decision 2013 Inventory37) is that the Defendant, as a trucking company, violated the restriction on operation of vehicles by loading more than 12.03 tons of freight on the third axis and operating a A freight vehicle in excess of 10 tons of the limited axis at the front of the vehicle moving at the 11:16th of October 30, 1994, in front of the front of the vehicle inspection station in the front of the Jeonnung-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has lost its effect by a ruling of unconstitutionality of Act No. 2011Hun-Ga24 of Dec. 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow