beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
No. 2 of the seized evidence and the order of preservation for confiscation by 2015 early 1163 of this Court.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 2014.
From February 2015 to May 20:10, 2015, the Defendant operated “D” in the Ethical City C from May 18, 2015, and arranged commercial sex acts by providing customers with 100,000 won, receiving 100,000 won from customers, and guiding customers as a smuggling.
Accordingly, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business from February 2015 to May 18, 2015.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. On-site photographs and copies of bankbooks;
1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to seven years of imprisonment;
2. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for sentencing [decision of types] the basic area of the arrangement of commercial sex acts (decision of the recommended area and the scope of the recommended punishment] by sexual traffic crime group-business, etc. (no special person shall be punished for six months to one year):
3. Although the defendant who was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime has committed the crime in this case again during the suspended sentence period, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that he reviews and reflects the crime;