logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단1889
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is engaged in the operation of a motor vehicle with a self-furd motor vehicle.

On May 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car at around 21:30, while driving the said car, the Defendant was proceeding along five-lanes from the direction of the Han field, where the five-lane roads for the agricultural and fishery market located in Taedong-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City are located in the Han field, Seodong-gu, Daejeon.

The intersection is the intersection where signal, etc. is installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped beyond the stop line, despite the fact that the pedestrian traffic signals (such as the installation of bicycle crossing sign) at the front side of the front side of the bicycle driven by the victim D (the 21 years old and south) crossing the crosswalk, and turned over the above victim's front side of the bicycle driving.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the above victim's negligence in the course of business by causing approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, vehicle photograph, and diagnosis report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the insurance coverage certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above, such as the first offense for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and the fact that vehicles are covered by comprehensive automobile insurance and are against the law.

arrow