logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.04.13 2017가단114223
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants were married to international marriage around July 2006, and around October 2016, introduced to the Plaintiff Nonparty B, Defendant B, the spouse of Defendant B, as the other party to the marriage of the Plaintiff Nonparty D.

B. On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,000,000 to the Defendants as the introduction fee and KRW 3,00,000 to the new father via the Defendants. On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 7,00,000 to the new father, and KRW 2,50,000 to the new father, respectively, on November 2, 2016.

C. On October 31, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased the Plaintiff’s husband and wife and D, the Defendants, and their two children, a total of KRW 3,538,00,000, to participate in the marriage ceremony of the Republic of Korea, which is located in Vietnam. On November 31, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased E’s towing items equivalent to KRW 1,590,000, serving as a policeman.

Plaintiff

Husband and wife, D, Defendants, and two their children entered Vietnam on November 23, 2016 to participate in the marriage ceremony. D, on November 25, 2016, entered the marriage ceremony, and on November 25, 2016, e and son’s family and relatives, 50 village residents, and completed the marriage report of D and E after returning to Korea on November 30, 2016.

E. The Plaintiff paid KRW 50,00,000 on October 24, 2016 to Nonparty F, who is a Vietnam administrative agent, for expenses for the marriage as above, and KRW 2,400,00 on November 22, 2016, and KRW 1,800,00 on December 26, 2016, respectively.

F. On November 27, 2016, the Plaintiff paid the US$5,000 to the new father as living expenses. On December 26, 2016, the Plaintiff paid the US$5,000 to E respectively under the pretext of cash.

(g) E did not enter Korea until now.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 12, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff had ① had no intention or ability to marry E from the beginning, thereby deceiving the Plaintiff.

arrow