The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment of the lower judgment (two years of suspended execution in one year and six months of imprisonment, forty hours of taking sexual assault treatment courses, confiscation) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The determination is based on the following facts: (a) the nature of the crime is not good; (b) the victim does not agree with the victim; (c) the criminal records of sexual assault are the only one time before the victim; (d) the Defendant led to the confession of the crime; (c) the photographed image does not actually spread; and (d) the damage amount of the damage amount of damage is minor.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in light of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments in this case, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.