logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.01 2016고단685
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. From August 12, 2000, the Defendant has traded over-the-counter checks in the name of the Doldong Branch of the Agricultural Cooperatives Federation and the Defendant from August 12, 2000.

On November 30, 2014, the Defendant indicated “D” as “E” in the Bill of D’s Bill of Indictment at the C Research Institute’s office located in G, G, B, G, the Defendant issued one copy of the check under the name of the Defendant named “D” (Evidence Record 5 pages). The Defendant’s issuance date is “10 million won”, “10 million won”, and “11 November 30, 2015.”

On December 2, 2015, the holder of the check presented the check payment to the same branch of the Nonghyup Bank.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, and where checks are recovered pursuant to Article 2(4) of the Illegal Check Control Act. According to the records of the instant case, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant collected the instant fees around March 10, 2016, which was the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow