logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고단2924
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2016, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) intending to call for the payment of the drinking value from the injured party after drinking the alcohol in D dan operated by the injured party C at D D D D Ga, which was operated by the victim C at D Dok-si; (b) and (c) the Defendant took a bath as “the drinking value falls short of the drinking value; (d) the C Doz for C Dok,” and obstructed the victim’s entertainment business by force by avoiding disturbances for about 20 minutes; and (b) intending to take part in the victim’s hand.

2. On November 11, 2016, the Defendant, who obstructed the performance of official duties, listened to the statement that he returned to him after calculating the drinking value from F from the background F of the region belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station Ear, Dong-dong Police Station, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Police Station Ear, sent out after being reported at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:50 on November 23, 2016, “The police far

“In doing so, assaulting the F’s breath by hand, which interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers’ order and the control of crimes.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s written statements, the list of cases to be reported, the on-site photographs, and the photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for a crime: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties). Selection of each fine;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing: The fact that there is no previous conviction or suspension of execution.

arrow