logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.13 2015가단133144
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 30,504,610, KRW 18,003,073, and each of the said amounts to Plaintiff B and C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E reported this fact to the hospital staff around 08:02 on September 29, 2015, when the Defendant was hospitalized in the “G Hospital” located in the Namyang-si, the Defendant operated on January 5, 2015, and received treatment, E was used in the hospital corridor around 08:00 on September 29, 2015, which was brought to the guardian of the patient next to the hospital at around 08:00 on the same day. (2) On the same day, other patients reported this fact to the hospital staff, and the caregiver of the Defendant hospital reported this fact to E around 08:03.

E was temporarily recovered from the emergency measures of the above caregiver and was temporarily closed, but was used again in the increase of length, such as telegraphless power due to the closure of the lab, the complete closure of the lab, and the suspension of depth due to such closure.

E had already been in the state of being 119 emergency squad's arrival at the site at around 08:15 according to the report of the Defendant hospital.

E transferred to “H hospital” at around 08:27, but died prior to the arrival of the H hospital.

(3) The instant accident was proved to be completely closed, the pulmonary suspension, and the heart suspension due to the deceased’s smoking. 4) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s wife, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children.

B. The Defendant hospital’s negligence at the Defendant hospital is operated as a closed ward where alcohol dependent patients are hospitalized and treated. As such, patients, including the Deceased, are entirely dependent on the Defendant hospital.

Therefore, the defendant hospital bears the duty of care to protect the life and body of the patient.

At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant hospital, even if the deceased was out of the temporary measure of closure due to the first hand-on method, is likely to completely re-satisfed due to the remaining foreign substances in the map, so it is possible to confirm the existence of foreign substances in the map and remove or remove them.

arrow