logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.05.30 2013고단1182
상표법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The following facts charged are somewhat smaller than facts charged, but it is judged that there is no substantial disadvantage in the exercise of the defendant's right to defend, thereby recognizing the facts charged as follows without any changes in indictment.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the manufacture and sales business of the massage machine, etc. with the trade name “E” in Ansan-si.

The defendant stated the facts charged in the facts charged around January 2009 as around January 2006, but according to the contract (the investigative record page) the contracting date is January 1, 2009.

The F and G facts in the dispute resolution plan between the F and the F are stated as the "appellant," and the complainant in this case is F and G, and according to the trademark registration ledger (28 pages of the investigation record), the obligee of registration is F and G.

On April 24, 2007, the facts charged against H (registration number: I, designated goods or designated service business: 10 Mama, first-aid hot packaging, secondary navigation, medical air beer, air beer for medical treatment, medical ice ice, medical ice ice, electrical ioncood for medical treatment, electricity ioncood for medical treatment, and electric temperature iond for medical treatment) on which the Defendant attached the above trademark are indicated as "private pressure cycle device" but the term "private pressure cycle device" in this context refers to an apparatus with air force (the investigative record 83,84,90). On the other hand, it is reasonable to see that the Mamama manufactured a pressure device and sold the above trademark as a type of 20 Mamama 1, which was manufactured and sold by the Plaintiff at will, but it is reasonable to 200 Mamama 2, which was manufactured and sold by the Plaintiff.

The defendant around August 31, 2012 is to JJ in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

arrow