beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. There is no dispute between the parties to the facts of recognition, or the following facts are acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 14.
A. On September 27, 1993, the Korea Exchange Bank Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial lent the above amount of the loan to the Co-Defendant B at the rate of KRW 9,900,00,000, KRW 1 year after handling the loan, KRW 1 year after handling the loan, interest rate of KRW 13% per annum, and overdue interest rate (17.5% per annum at that time) (hereinafter “instant loan”). The Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed all obligations to the Korea Exchange Bank Co., Ltd. under the instant loan agreement.
B. B applied for the extension of due date on September 27, 1994, which is the due date of the instant loan (application for the extension of due date of loans No. 14), and the Korea Exchange Bank Co., Ltd. extended the due date of the instant loan by September 27, 1995.
C. As of September 27, 1995, the remainder of the principal of the instant loan as of September 27, 1995, was KRW 5,574,852, and the Korea Exchange Bank paid KRW 26,100 on July 8, 1998 as the term “original cash (credit)”.
(A) No. 11, d.
Even on September 27, 1995, the extended maturity of the loan of this case, B and the defendant, a joint guarantor, who is the principal debtor of the loan of this case, did not repay the principal and interest of the loan of this case. On September 9, 200, Korea Exchange Bank filed a lawsuit against Dong-in on September 9, 200, Seoul Central District Court 200DaDa1503958, and on December 22, 2000, the above court decided on December 22, 200, "B and the defendant jointly and severally with the Korea Exchange Bank to Korea Exchange Bank to pay 7,61,82 won per annum and 17.5% per annum from March 30, 197 to November 19, 200, and 25% per annum from the next day to September 16, 201, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 16, 2018.