Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 7, 2019, the Defendant was asked to leave from E, a police officer of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station Dental Police Station D, who was called to the site after receiving 112 report on the ground of vision and disturbance with employees at the place in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, on August 7, 2019, in the course of requesting the above E to leave (at the request to leave the Defendant on the part of the restaurant, the Defendant will not have the police of the Republic of Korea as to whether he she satis, satis, satch, and satisf, satch.).

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the police officer as above and obstructed the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A witness's written statement and a written statement;

1. Investigation report (Examination of CCTV images that have occurred);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of a criminal investigation report (review of images taken by police officers visiting the site), and reproduction of CDs attached to police officers recording at the site;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, including the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of the exercise of tangible force is not serious, but there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine, because the use of violence was committed against the police officer who was in the course of performing official duties, and the degree of the exercise of tangible force is not serious.