The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The content stated in the purport of the instant case, which was distributed by the Defendants of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, is nothing more than a false fact but more than a little exaggeration.

Even if the contents are false, there is a justifiable reason to believe the truth with those of the defendants' family members directly experienced, and the general assembly to which the defendants belong for the public interest as an act for the interest and interest of the members of the Association, and therefore the illegality is excluded by the Criminal Code Article 310.

B. The lower court’s respective punishment (a fine of three million won) imposed on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that Defendant A is the president of the General Assembly of the C Association, Defendant D is the vice president of the same Association, and the said Association is an organization in conflict with the E Association, the victim of which is the E Association.

On August 26, 2017, the Defendants held a general meeting of the C Association at the meeting of the F Hotel of the Young-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan, and approximately 200 believers were gathered to receive 500,000 won or more at one time and received 10 times or more, while having sexual intercourse with many women, they committed a crime of contributing to tyring, such as cutting off money and destroying a large number of families by having sexual intercourse with them, which is jointly owned by H, I’s property, which is an unlawful disposal of the property of the H, and I’s property, and taking away money and valuables of sexual intercourse without being able to receive 10,000 won or more at one time, and disposing of the property of the K Association without being able to receive 10,000 won or more at one time, and, if she occupied the property of the K Association by taking advantage of the property of the members of the K Association with no permission, the Defendants occupied the property of the Korea Association with no permission.