1. Defendant B’s KRW 60,000,000 as well as 15% per annum from November 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019, and the following.

1. Defendant B, D, E, Plaintiff, F, and G are siblings, and Defendant C is the husband of Defendant B.

(C) fact that there is no dispute; 2. Sales

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had the Defendants keep 430,000,000 won in custody, and received a total of 370,000,000 won from the Defendants. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants had the remainder of 60,000,000 won in custody.

As to this, the Defendants asserted that, upon the Plaintiff’s request, they did not keep the Plaintiff’s money in custody, even though they remitted the amount of KRW 370,000 to the Plaintiff.

B. As to the claim against Defendant B, if the purport of the entire argument is added to the purport of each statement of evidence Nos. 4 and 9, witness D’s testimony, and each order to submit financial data to Defendant H, Defendant B’s account opened on June 9, 2008, and deposited KRW 30,000,000, and KRW 20,000,000, through E on July 24, 2009, deposited KRW 387,000,000 with the passbook in the name of Defendant B through the head of Tong, from October 5, 2010 to September 4, 2018, Plaintiff B should not be able to return the remainder of KRW 336,350 (in short, KRW 369,985,00) to the Plaintiff under the name of Defendant B’s head of Tong’s name until September 4, 2018, Plaintiff C should be able to return the remainder of KRW 300,000.

In this fact, the amount of money equivalent to 437,700,000 won which was first deposited in Defendant B’s name has been continuously deposited in the new account in the process of cancelling and re-ing an installment savings after cancelling the installment savings thereafter, and managing it separately from other property of Defendant B.