All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Defendant A is a company member.

The victim B is three years after C, the victim D is one of the two years E and two years, and the defendant and the victims may know at all.

At around 01:40 on September 24, 2017, the Defendant, when the victims talk with the outside of the instant building on the ground that the victims talk with the outside of the instant building on the ground that he or she did so, and the face of the victim B (the victim B (the victim 18 years old, South) once on the floor of hand, and assaulted the victim B (the victim 18 years old, South) once on the top of hand, and four times on the back of drinking. In this case, the Defendant used the face of the victim D (the victim 18 years old, South) who speaks in the face of the victim D (the victim 18 years old, South) to breath, and assaulted the victim at one time on the floor of hand.

2. All the facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victims pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In doing so, the victims submitted to this court a written statement to the effect that they agreed with the Defendants and that they do not want criminal punishment for the Defendants after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, all of the public prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.