logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.21 2020나28695
소유권말소등기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance was completed.

“Along with the completion of the registration of the preservation of ownership (in the case of land No. 3 of this case, the acquisition of the registry was completed as the acquisition of the registry was completed).”

The judgment of the court of first instance, on the 8th page 3 and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, each “the prescription period for the acquisition of possession” is determined as “the prescription period for the acquisition of possession and the acquisition of the register” respectively.

The judgment of the court of first instance, on the 8th page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "within 20 years" is deemed "within 10 years or between 20 years."

The judgment of the court of first instance, on the 8th page 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the prescription for the acquisition of possession on the premise of possession for a period of 20 years” is “the prescription for the acquisition of a register and the prescription for the acquisition of possession on the premise of possession for a period of 10 years or 20 years.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow