1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:53 on January 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 12:53, the Defendant: (b) opened the head car by driving the victim’s head car on his hand; (c) moved the victim’s head car from the rear seat to the driver’s seat; and (d) opened the driver’s seat after moving the victim’s head car from the rear seat to the driver’s seat; and (d) opened the driver’s seat after moving the victim’s head car from the rear seat to the driver’s seat; and (e) tried to use the victim’s seat after moving the victim to the driver’s seat in front of the same Gu F building on the ground that the victim passed the actual destination.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (report on the victim B telephone conversations - Unagreement, confirmation of the intention of punishment);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal papers, investigation reports, - Blus video fluor photographs, - Blus video blus video bluors, CDs, internal investigation reports (Attachment of Injury Certificate), and injury diagnosis reports.

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes as to the relevant criminal facts and Article 5-10 (1) of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's assertion on the proviso of Article 39-17 (1) of the Welfare of Older Persons Act (in light of the defendant's age, occupation, environment, risk of repeating a crime, details and motive of the crime, the degree of disadvantage and expected side effects of the defendant's entrance due to the employment restriction order, the prevention of the crime of elder abuse and the effect of protecting the victim, etc., it is deemed that there are special circumstances where the defendant should not issue an employment restriction order against the defendant).