Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6.2 million to Plaintiff A and each of the said money to Plaintiff B, C, D, and E, KRW 3.2 million on April 13, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status (1) the deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”) was the owner of the multi-family house on the third floor above the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G ground (hereinafter “Plaintiff building”). The Plaintiff A is his wife, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E. their children.
(2) The Defendant is the owner of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu multi-family house with the fifth floor above the H-ground (hereinafter “Defendant building”).
B. On October 2, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract for the maintenance and repair works and the subcontract (1) with respect to the “K” owned by the Defendant, including the Company I (hereinafter “I”) and the J & the Defendant’s building.
(2) Meanwhile, around November 2014, I entered into a subcontract with L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”) on the said maintenance and repair works. In other words, L entered into a subcontract with M and M on January 5, 2015 on the interior interior interior interior interior and outdoor construction works.
C. On March 2, 2015, the Defendant received a civil petition with the purport that the fence repair work and the instant accident occurred (1) that there is a risk of collapse due to rupture in the fence of the first floor parking lot on the ground of the Defendant’s building. The Defendant, to I, to I, to L, and to L, to have M perform the fence repair work.
M began to remove a wall from March 6, 2015, and part of the wall was collapsed toward the Plaintiff’s building.
(2) On April 13, 2015, when the work was discontinued, around 18:15, when the work was discontinued, there was an accident in which the deceased, entering the site of the fence repair work, was sleeped, and was sleeped to the Plaintiff’s sewage hole, and where approximately 1.8 meters away from the wall of the Plaintiff’s building and the ground surface of the Plaintiff’s building, and died due to two damage (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(1) The ground of the parking lot on the first floor of the defendant's building is about 1.8m higher than the ground of the plaintiff's building, and there is no fence.