beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal by the defendant;
A. Although there was a fact that he/she received KRW 2 million from E on June 16, 2014 under the pretext of a request for investigation with respect to F, which is a branch of E for the investigation of the investigation case on June 23, 2014, instead of receiving KRW 2 million from E on June 23, 2014 under the pretext of a request for investigation with respect to F, which is a branch of E for the investigation of the investigation case on June 23, 2014, he/she borrowed from D as the cost of attorney-at-law appointment, who is an employee of the company, instead
B. On January 21, 2014, the portion received KRW 1,50,00,00 in the above money was not received in consideration of I’s legal counseling and written complaint, but it was received by H as to the Defendant’s past funeral ceremony to H. In relation to the instant case, I paid the said money. In relation to the instant case, the U.S. statement of grounds for appeal that I received summons from the prosecutor’s office on October 19, 2014, and introduced I was called by I. However, the U.S. statement that I made it known from the Defendant’s newspaper that I had been called by U.S. phone.
C. On July 25, 2014, the part of the receipt of KRW 4 million on the part of the Defendant, upon request of L to appoint an attorney-at-law and request him to process the case. Upon receipt of a request from L to request, the Defendant processed the said case by requesting T’s subsequent attorney through T as an employee of the company, and the Defendant did not receive any money from L on the ground that the attorney would not receive any cost.
The money is paid as rent by L to use the office in which the defendant is located in the future.
2. Determination:
A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged in relation to the receipt of KRW 2 million on June 23, 2014 as the solicitation of the investigation case by the lower court and the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the party branch, the Defendant is sufficiently aware of the fact that he/she received KRW 2 million from E as the solicitation of the investigation case regarding F, who is the land of E, from E, to his/her account.