logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.02 2016구합1302
압류체납세반환
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 3, 200, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Suwon-si on the ground that “the Plaintiff had no capacity to own a motor vehicle while residing in the Suwon-si, the Plaintiff became a person with severe mental stress due to his official’s unlawful performance of duties, such as receiving the written notice of criminal complaint and the amount of delinquent tax from the Defendant several times from August 20, 197 to June 1999,” but the judgment dismissing the lawsuit became final and conclusive.

(C) The Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court 201Na19150) Na. 2000 Doz. 5462, Seoul High Court 201Na19150

On January 28, 2002, Suwon-si received a decision to determine the amount of litigation costs that “the amount of litigation costs to be repaid by the Plaintiff at the time of Suwon-si is KRW 7,110,040,040” from the Sungnam branch of the Suwon-si branch of the Suwon District Court (Seoul District Court Branch 2001Kadan1966), and on February 6, 2002, the Defendant delegated the Suwon-si branch to pay KRW 7,110,040 to the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant with the Suwon District Court seeking revocation of the above non-tax revenue payment notice, but the above court rendered a dismissal judgment on the ground that “non-tax revenue payment notice is merely a judicial claim seeking litigation costs according to the court’s determination on the amount of litigation costs and cannot be deemed a disposition subject to appeal litigation.”

(The Seoul High Court Decision 2002Nu19741, Supreme Court Decision 2003Du5082). D.

On June 12, 2006, the Defendant seized the Plaintiff’s share among the 2,500 square meters and C 4,000 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, and notified the Plaintiff of the attachment on the same day. On June 14, 2006, the Defendant registered the attachment of the instant share on the same day.

E. After September 208, 2008, the Defendant.

arrow