logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2019.03.08 2018고정213
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who resides in C at three times, and the victim C is a person who resides in D(E) at the time next to the Defendant’s residence, but the written indictment is written as E. However, it is obvious that it is a clerical error in D(T at three times) at three times, and it is not likely that the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense may not cause any substantial disadvantage. Thus, ex officio correction was made

A project owner who implements new construction of neighborhood living facilities and detached houses (the fifth floor main complex building) in the neighborhood living facilities and detached houses (the fifth floor), and the defendant continued to conflict with the victim as the victim does not compensate for the damage caused by the construction.

1. 명예훼손 피고인은 2017. 8. 8.경 위 피고인의 주거지 담벼락에 ‘늙은이가 삼척시민들에게 하소연합니다. 귀 기울여 들어주세요! 다른 사람들 차는 못 세우게 하고, 자기 건축현장 일꾼들 차만 세워서 F상가 내 상인들의 생존권과 재산권을 위협하는 건축주, 공사하다 문제 생기면 잘라내고, 남의 땅 밑으로 철근 박아놓은 건축주, 소음측정 및 안전점검 차 방문한 시청 공무원도 출입 못하게 하는 건축주, 가스폭발현장에서 건축설계와는 다른 용도로 사용승인 받으려는 꼼수 10단 건축주’라고 기재된 현수막을 설치하였다.

However, there was no fact that the victim was unable to park the vehicle of neighboring merchants as the owner, and there was no fact that the building was installed towards the defendant's residential area in consultation with the defendant, and there was no fact that there was no fact that the victim had been prevented from entering the construction site of the viewing public official who visited the noise measurement and safety inspection, and there was no fact that the victim did not want to obtain approval for use for any

Nevertheless, the Defendant, after installing the above banner, maintained it until May 2018, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendant is an insulting banner installed as provided in paragraph (1).

arrow