The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 21, 1993, at around 21:05, the Defendant is the owner of the A vehicle, and around 10:05, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated the said vehicle while loaded with steel bars of 15 tons, 15 tons, and 46 tons of total weight at the third axis of the said vehicle, in excess of 10 tons of limited weight, 10 tons of weight, 15 tons of weight, 15 tons of weight, and 46 tons of weight.

2. The prosecutor charged the above charged facts by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995). Accordingly, this court issued a summary order of KRW 200,00 to the defendant as of February 3, 1994, and the above summary order became final and conclusive after being notified to the defendant at that time, but the defendant filed a request for review of the above summary order on the ground that the above provision of the law became unconstitutional.

On the other hand, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 84 (1) in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that the 201Hun-Ga24 dated December 29, 201 should be in violation of the Constitution. In accordance with the above decision of unconstitutionality, the above provision of the law has retroactively lost its effect.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is so decided as per Disposition by the judgment of not guilty against the defendant under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.