The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the second 13 G of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended to J; and (b) the fourth 1 of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following to the subsequent 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

“4 The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant borrowed KRW 150,00,000 as the attorney appointment fee of J around September 2016. However, according to the fact-finding results with respect to K law firms, according to the results of the fact-finding inquiries with respect to K law firms, L unions, and the results of the financial transaction information meetings with respect to M companies, it appears that J’s wife N paid attorney appointment fee, and that the money remitted to E by the Plaintiff cannot be found that the money transferred to E was used for the above purpose.

“”

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.