logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2020.07.22 2020고정54
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing a means of access, no one shall borrow or lend, keep, deliver or distribute the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any compensation, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

On August 28, 2019, the Defendant accepted a proposal from a nameless person who assumes the knowledge of Internet advertising that “on the face of sending a physical card connected to the account in the name of the credit service provider, the Defendant would make a loan by pretending to the transaction performance by repeating the withdrawals,” and then, around 14:47 of the same day, the Defendant sent Kwikset service articles that had been named and sent from C points in the name of the Defendant’s bank account (Account Number: D) to Kwikset service articles that had been named and sent at C points in the name of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant promised to receive the means of access in return for the intangible expected interest of future loans by enhancing credit rating through false deposit and withdrawal transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report of investigation (the summary of the result of execution of seizure) (the summary of execution of seizure);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a petition;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the means of access transferred by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has caused damage as a result of the use of the means of access for “singing,” and the fact that the defendant is the primary offender, and the conditions

arrow