logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.08.26 2016고단900
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 12, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act at a public densely located place) committed an indecent act against the victim by cutting the rear pole in the C bus that passed near the Mapong-dong, Mapyeong-dong, Mapyeong-dong, Sungnam-si, in the direction of the victim D (In such case, 24 years old) with the back door attached thereto, and cutting down the victim’s body on the left door, cutting down the victim’s body, cutting down the victim’s seat, finding the victim’s seat, leaving the seat on the door, leaving the victim’s left hand, leaving the victim’s right-hand seat, and putting the victim’s hand on the victim’s hand, thereby committing an indecent act.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act on the victim in a bus which is a means of public transportation.

2. 강제 추행 피고인은 2015. 12. 12. 03:10 경 경기 성남시 분당구 E에 있는 F 역에서 위 제 1 항과 같은 버스에서 하차한 피해자에게 다가가 “ 커피를 한 잔 마시자” 고 말을 걸고, 피해자가 이를 거절함에도 다시 피해자에게 다가가 팔짱을 끼고, 그 부근 의 인적이 없는 G 마트 쪽으로 피해자를 끌고 가 양 팔로 피해자를 끌어안고, 손을 피해 자의 점퍼 안으로 넣어 피해자의 가슴을 만지고, 다시 손을 피해 자의 치마 속으로 넣어 피해자의 엉덩이와 허벅지를 만져 피해자를 강제로 추행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. Each written statement [The Defendant appears to have asserted that he/she is unable to memory by drinking while making a confession of all of the crimes of this case. Thus, in light of various circumstances, such as the background, means, details of each of the crimes of this case, and the behavior of the Defendant before and after the commission of each of the crimes of this case, it is recognized that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the commission of each of the crimes of this case, but the ability to discern things or make decisions.

arrow