1. The Defendant: 80,000,000 won to the Plaintiff A; 60,000,000 won to the Plaintiff B; 80,000,000 won to the Plaintiff C; and 110.

1. The Defendant, with the indication of the claim, deceivings the Plaintiffs without the ability or intent to guarantee the principal or to pay the proceeds therefrom, with the content that “the interest of 3 to 4% per month is given and the principal is preserved.” The Defendant entered into each investment contract with the Plaintiffs, and 60,000,000 won from the Plaintiff A, and 80,000,000 won from the Plaintiff C, and 110,000,000 won from the Plaintiff D, and 20,000,000 won from the Plaintiff E without paying the proceeds after October 2017.

As seen above, the plaintiffs have concluded the above investment contract by deceiving the defendant, and thus the above investment contract shall be revoked in accordance with Article 110 of the Civil Code by serving the duplicate of the complaint of this case, and the return of each of the above investments shall

2. Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment made by deeming that the relevant provisions of Acts are private);