Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On November 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 26, 2014.
[Criminal facts] The Defendant committed acts as if he could help the victim D, who operates C Co., Ltd. receive money from the injured party, as he could help them receive a subcontract for construction work.
1. On September 2014, the Defendant: (a) called the victim D by telephone, and need to be posted to the victim D with “a civil engineering work that performs the reclamation of the sea at a macroscopic system; and (b) money needs to be paid.
On December 30, 2014, the loan money is connected to the lending of money to receive a subcontract for civil engineering works.
“The phrase “ was false.”
However, the defendant did not have any business that had no certain income at the time, and there was no intention or ability of the victim to help the victim receive the subcontract for the above civil works.
The Defendant received KRW 2 million from the injured party on the pretext of the borrowed money from around that time to October 15, 2014, including the Defendant’s receipt of KRW 7 million from that time.
Accordingly, the defendant was given money by deceiving the victim.
2. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant is at the work site located in Nam-gu E-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, and the victim may fully repay the amount of money to the victim up to the amount of money that he/she borrowed from his/her own funds by obtaining profits from the project currently being promoted.
In addition, the wind power generation complex construction is under way in Ulsan, connects the construction to be subcontracted, and connects the construction to be subcontracted for the division rearrangement project that is scheduled to be undertaken at Pyeongtaek-si if the construction is not implemented.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, the defendant did not have any business that had no certain income at the time, and there was no intention or ability of the victim to receive the subcontract for the above construction work.