(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2014.12.12 2014가합36

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2014.12.12 2014가합36

심사비지급청구 등

Text

1. The dismissal of the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on November 26, 2013 and dismissal of the Plaintiff on March 17, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company established for the certification of quality management, etc. under the provisions of the Quality Control and the Management of Industrial Products Act, and the plaintiff is a full-time examiner who has been engaged in the business of proving quality management.

B. On September 16, 201, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant to provide the Plaintiff with an examination board training, and entered into an examination board agreement with the Defendant to take charge of the Defendant’s examination when the Plaintiff acquired the qualification of the examination board, and received the examination board training from the Defendant.

The main contents of the review committee agreement are as follows:

(A) “A” and “B” refer to the Plaintiff. (Contract Terms) A shall conduct the review personnel training to B and shall undergo the review personnel training at the direction of A without interruption.

B shall accept the examination committee training in good faith until the completion of the examination committee training, and shall comply with the following matters after the completion of the examination committee training:

1) In principle, Eul shall serve as an examiner for the company B for three years from the date of registration of the examiner, except where there is no plan to fill the examiner for the company B; ii) if Eul fails to serve as an examiner for the company B due to personal inevitable circumstances, it shall consult with Gap in advance.

In such cases, A may claim training expenses (not exceeding 3 million won) against B.

C. On October 31, 201, the Plaintiff prepared a written oath with the following contents and submitted it to the Defendant, and began to receive monthly wages of KRW 4,000,000 from the Defendant as the chief of C office. At the time, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not prepare a labor contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

A written oath shall be

2.The principal shall observe the matters of a labor contract and a written pledge of confidentiality, promise to observe strictly the following matters, and draw up this pledge:

1) The time for commuting to and from work shall be strictly and reasonably responsible, comply with the company’s regulations and shall follow its instructions in good faith; 2).

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.12.11 2015나4049

-제주지방법원 2016.04.08 2014가단45958

-광주지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단969

-수원지방법원성남지원 2017.08.08 2016가합206716

-서울남부지방법원 2014.02.07 2012가단9175