Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairman of the representative meeting of occupants of C apartment at the time of a show, and the defendant B is a person who is the managing director of C apartment, and D is the representative of the above apartment.

1. On September 7, 2017, the Defendants: (a) discovered that the sign of the representative meeting of occupants was omitted in the column of the participants; (b) instructed Defendant B to arbitrarily put it into the column of the representative meeting; and (c) Defendant B instructed Defendant B to the effect that “the sign of the front minutes is affixed a sign of the public notice; and (d) Defendant B signed D on March 31, 2016, on which the sign of the resident representative meeting was signed, attached the part of the participants in the public notice as a result of the resident representative meeting on September 7, 2016, and copied it.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge D’s signature for the purpose of exercising.

2. The Defendants posted a notice of the regular meeting of occupants under the name of the representative of occupants, whose name was forged, in the manner described in paragraph 1, at the time of posting the C Apartment and the notice.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use forged D’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Notice of a meeting of the representatives of regular occupants on September 2016;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Articles 239(1), 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 239(2), 239(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of exercising a signature of the above investigation);

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants are subject to suspended execution: (a) the Defendants’ grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are contrary to the recognition of the instant crime; (b) the Defendants did not have any history of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; and (c) the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime; and (d) the motive and background of the crime.