The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is the chief of the management department of C in Gyeonggi-si B.

1. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant purchased a DX480L search machine with a loan of KRW 70 million from the victim EF Savings Bank at the above C office, and around October 13, 2015, the Defendant created a mortgage on the above dX480 printing machine in the name of the victim company.

Around October 25, 2015, the Defendant leased the 6 million won unit to the above E (E) office on condition that one of the above C office would receive 6 million won per month, and handed over the e.g., the e.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed the goods of the defendant, which is the object of the victim's right, and interfered with the victim's exercise of right.

2. On November 10, 2015, the Defendant purchased a FRBEX300 LC digging machine with a loan of 65 million won from the victim K Savings Bank at the above C office, and on November 12, 2015, established a mortgage on the said digging machine in the name of the victim company.

On November 2015, the Defendant handed over the above excavation ground to G on condition that G receive two million won per month from G in the above C office at the time of the date of November 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed the goods of the defendant, which is the object of the victim's right, and interfered with the victim's exercise of right.

2. The facts charged in the instant case, on the sole basis of the facts charged on the board, the Defendant leased the instant so-called so-called “ciring” with monthly rent, and according to the records, the Defendant is acknowledged to engage in equipment leasing business, and the fact that the leased so-called “ciring” was not sufficient to deem that the Defendant had an intention to obstruct the exercise of rights, and it is also difficult to view that the act of lease

Therefore, the defendant is acquitted.