A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for property damage, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on January 24, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.

On May 26, 2017, around 11:24, the Defendant raised an objection in relation to the disclosure of information requested by the Defendant in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geum-ro 865 Seoul Nam-dong 8 Dong-dong 8, Dong-dong 8, Dong-dong 2017, and demanded C to have a staff member in charge of information disclosure, who divided the several emergency bells, and repeatedly requested C to have a staff member in charge of information disclosure, and continues to request C to have a staff member in charge of information disclosure;

D. In the case of a bitch of bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch, the bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch,

C assaulted to C at one time on the side that reads as a hand while taking a bath.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning prison officers' confinement supervision.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That the circumstances favorable to the sentencing of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act shall not have the criminal records punished by the defendant due to interference with the execution of official duties;

The defendant has been sentenced two times to imprisonment due to the damage of property, interference with business, etc., and the crime of this case is committed by assaulting a correctional officer who conducts correction duties, and is very poor, and the defendant does not appear to reflect on the crime of this case.