Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Busan District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 4 million from the same court on January 20, 2015 to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On 25, 2015. 04:08 around 04:08, the Defendant driven a C rocketing car with alcohol content of 0.053% under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 6km from the front line of the So-called So-called Busan, Busan, the trade name of which is unknown to the front line of the Kimhae-si, to the front line of the Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on detection of any violation of traffic laws (drinking, non-licensed driving) on roads, report on the circumstances of drivers driving, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the circumstances of driving a drinking;

1. An inquiry letter of driver's license and the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reporting (Attachment to summary orders);

1. Driving under the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act without a license: Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant again committed the instant crime under the same type of permission even though he/she had been sentenced to a fine for a crime of violating road traffic law, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, the Defendant committed the instant crime at a disadvantage of the Defendant.

However, the defendant divided his wrong mind into depth and re-entered the road traffic laws and regulations, and immediately after drinking, the defendant was driving without delay, but after taking the water volume for several hours, and the amount of alcohol concentration in the blood at the time of driving under the influence of alcohol in this case is on the side.