Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2014, at around 20:10, the Defendant heard that “C” located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “D” had been reported 112, and that “Neman’s business interfered with his business,” had been finished by E, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Songpa Police Station D District, and called “Neman’s business was finished,” and that “Is back to home, i.e., what he would be, what he would be, what he would be, what he would be, what he would be, what he would be, what he would be, and what would be, what would be, what would be, what would be, what would be, what would be, what would be, what would be,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant is led to confession and reflects in the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the degree of assault is minor; (c) contingent crimes; and (d) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; and (e) there is no record of other