Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 10, 2015, at around 00:12, the Defendant received a report from the Defendant and a taxi engineer on the occurrence of vision due to taxi rate, and made a statement on the case circumstances to D with the victim D, who belongs to the Daejeon Dong Police Station C District of the Daejeon Police Station called the Defendant’s horse, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “if he can be punished for the crime of spackers, spacks, and insult,” and assaulted the victim’s timber at one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of the victim and crime prevention affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with D, E’s self-statement, and F’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attachCCTV-sup data);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although it cannot be said that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is good, the defendant has no particular criminal record in addition to the punishment imposed by a fine for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents prior to about 10 years, the defendant has committed an anti-discrimination and not re-offending, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the age, character and behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the other factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case.