A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 11. 18. 19:40경 창원시 마산회원구 D에 있는 E마트 앞 도로에서, 112신고를 받고 출동한 마산동부경찰서 F지구대 소속 경찰공무원인 경사 G가 사건 경위를 묻던 중 피고인이 떨어뜨린 동전을 주워주려고 고개를 숙이자 술에 취하여 G의 입술 부분을 오른발로 1회 걷어찼다.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers regarding patrol duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement of G prepared by the police;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person in charge of obstruction of performance of official duties (Article 62-2) (Article 1 of the Act on Probation) (Article 62-2 of the Act on Probation shall be sentenced to a suspended sentence ordering probation as above, taking into account the following: imprisonment for six months, suspension of execution for two years, probation (Article 6 of the Act on Probation in consideration of the fact that the defendant has the same military force as the defendant; imprisonment is selected in consideration of the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, confession of the defendant, confession of the defendant through alcohol dependence aftermatha, urology, or armatitis, and that the defendant's parents actively protect the defendant);