A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

From June 17, 1993, the Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the two-way branch and the Defendant from around 17, 1993, and has traded over the check.

On March 31, 2011, the Defendant issued a check number “E”, “E”, “amount of 3,00,000,000”, and “date of issuance” on March 31, 2011, when the check was presented to the said bank on March 31, 201, when the check was presented to the Defendant in the payment period. However, on May 1, 2011, the Defendant issued a 32,50,000 won’s household check and presented it within the payment period, but the check was presented to the said bank on March 31, 201, when the check was presented to the Defendant. However, the Defendant issued a 13-year check and presented it within the payment period, but did not receive it as a deposit shortage and a non-transaction transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check and Selection of Imprisonment;

1. It is recognized that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are divided into one's own mistakes, and that the defendant has no particular criminal conviction in addition to two fines.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, that the amount of damage is considerable, but the damage is not yet paid up to the extent of damage, and the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case.