Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant committed fraud against the victim B around 01:50 on December 30, 2014, and the fact that the Defendant did not intend or have the ability to pay the taxi fee even if he did not have certain occupation or income at the time. However, even if he did not intend or have the ability to pay the taxi fee, the Defendant demanded the victim to operate the taxi even if he was aboard the victim B’s C taxi and would have paid the taxi fee, and the victim would have demanded the victim to operate the taxi even if he did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee. After having arrived at the high-spoon Gun, the Defendant again demanded the Defendant to request the operation to the new local unit of the high-sposi-dong, Gosung-dong, Gosung-dong, 10,000 won in total.

2. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00, the victim D’s 09:00, and (b) on December 30, 2014, the Defendant requested the victim to undergo cosmetic surgery as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the cosmetic even if she had no certain occupation or income; (c) the victim did not have any intent or ability to pay the cosmetic; and (d) the victim requested the victim to undergo the surgery for the extension of the labbbing surgery; and (e) the Defendant received the labing surgery for the extension of the labbing surgery from

3. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 03:05, at the first point of the operation of the Victim G G G in Ha, the Defendant issued an order to the victim as if he would have had no intent or ability to pay the price, even if he had been provided the alcohol and food from the injured party due to the lack of certain occupation or import; (b) the Defendant ordered the victim, as if he had paid the price, to be paid the price; and (c) received the alcohol and food equivalent to KRW 78,00 in total from the injured party; and (d) obtained the same amount of monetary benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made against G, D, or B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigation results;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.