1. The defendant A is not guilty. 2. The defendant B is not guilty. The defendant B is punished by a fine not exceeding 2,00,000 won.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

A crime history room (Defendant B) around December 18, 2013 at H hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant made an illegal solicitation, such as “There is a new drug injection system in preparation for the registration of benefits in L corporation, but the Defendant exercised positive influence in the process of the registration of benefits, or made efforts to receive benefits in favor of the Defendant.” In response, the Defendant made an entertainment with the sum of KRW 162,00,000 from the above day to August 8, 2016, and made the above K in total 35 times in consideration of the above illegal solicitation as stated in the list of crimes in attached Table 11,484,250 won in consideration of such solicitation.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements concerning K in the suspect examination protocol of each prosecutor's office;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting investigations by prosecutors;

1. Relevant Article 357 of the Criminal Act and Articles 357 (2) and 357 (1) of the Criminal Act (generally, selection of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The sentencing guidelines do not apply as the defendant was selected to impose a fine on the reasons for sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.

1. Scope of punishment by law: A fine not exceeding five million won;

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant, who is an employee of the pharmaceutical company, offers money and entertainment equivalent to KRW 110 million to the non-standing review committee members of the JJ for about two years and eight months in charge of determining whether the Defendant, who is an employee of the pharmaceutical company, is eligible for the charge of the crime of this case, in that it has undermined social trust in the fairness of the work of I and the JJ commission.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided the errors, and there is no criminal record of the same kind of crime and of the suspension of qualification or more, and K's affirmative action in the superior position.