logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.06.28 2018구합1725
부작위위법확인 등
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In an administrative litigation, the purport of the claim shall be clearly identified so that its contents and scope can be clearly identified. Since the issue is whether it is specified, inasmuch as the purport of the claim is not specified in the ex officio investigation, the court shall order ex officio correction and dismiss the lawsuit if it does not comply with

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da5069, Oct. 9, 2008). The Plaintiff stated in the complaint that the contents and scope of the claim cannot be clearly identified as above. Although this court ordered the Plaintiff to make amendments to specify the purport of the claim, the Plaintiff did not comply with such order within the designated period.

Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 254(2) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act, an order to dismiss a complaint shall be issued, but since a complaint has been served on the Defendants and the lawsuit has been continued, the suit in this case shall be dismissed by judgment without holding any pleadings. It is so decided as per

arrow