(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단1646

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단1646

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a company member, and the victim B(37 years of age) is a space that he first became aware of on the day of the case.

On March 31, 2019, at around 01:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by force, such as making the victim's her mared with his mared one time, on the ground that he was flick in the 1st floor D music room of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building C, and on the ground that he was flick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A complaint;

1. Determination of the defendant and defense counsel's assertion of recording, recording file, and recording file

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant was flicker for the victim who is singing a singing monitor, and the victim was able to look back with the back part of the Cheongban in which the victim was singled, and he did not have the victim's her her her her her her her her her her but her her her her her her her

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence admitted as evidence of guilt prior to the judgment, namely, ① the victim made an indecent act from the investigative agency to this court, specifically and consistently. In light of the following circumstances, the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court that he/she had committed an indecent act against the Defendant. In addition to the fact that the victim was under the risk of being punished for a false accusation or perjury, the victim’s statement cannot be deemed to have been filed in bad faith, and the victim’s statement contents and the victim’s attitude of statement in the court, etc., the victim’s statement is deemed to be credibility. ② On April 1, 2019, the day following the date of the occurrence of the case, the victim’s statement in the telephone call with the victim is memory that “the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her. her her her her her her her. her

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고합565

-대구지방법원 2018.05.18 2018노941

-청주지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고정989

-서울북부지방법원 2012.11.09 2012고단1756

-전주지방법원 2013.01.24 2012고합247