The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant’s perception of his mistake and reflects the fact that there is no particular punishment power, other than those subject to punishment once due to the crime of immigration around 2000.

On the other hand, in light of the method of committing the instant crime, the amount of damage, and the degree of participation, etc., the nature of the instant crime is not easy, and the Defendant was unable to agree with the victims and appears to have failed to recover the damage, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable in light of the following circumstances, even if there is no change in circumstances that may be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the lower court

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.