1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three hundred thousand won.

2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating a contractor with the trade name of Busan Jung-gu G and H in the middle-gu, and Defendant B is an employee of the above company from May 2014.

Defendant

On May 2014, A completed remodeling construction works for J 202 of the Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, which was requested by the victim I on May 2014. After the victim requested construction works for the same building No. 201, the injured party requested another business operator for construction works for the same building No. 201, and the defendants under the above No. 201 were demanded from the injured party to demand additional payment of construction cost, and conspired to interfere with construction works for the above No. 201.

1. On July 22, 2014, the Defendants found the construction site around 11:00 on July 22, 2014, and took place at the construction site around 201: (a) stated that “I will not perform any work”; (b) I would like to read “I will not perform any work”; (c) I would like to call the body of the people who were working in the work at that site to the effect that the victim’s fraud is changed; and (d) let the body of the people who drinked with the brush stop working.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the work of the injured party by force.

2. A crime on September 2, 2014;

A. From September 2, 2014, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the work, thereby obstructing the work of the victimized person by force by leaving the Defendants to take the measures in the same manner as Paragraph 1 at the construction site of 201, around September 10, 2014.

B. In the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, Defendant A publicly insultingd the victim by spreading the abusive theory, such as “the victim’s “the victim’s deception, Chewing,” etc., at the place where the public parts are located.

(c)

On September 2, 2014, Defendant A was unable to use a strong key to the cityless No. 202, which was attached to the front door of the 202 on September 2, 2014, and damaged the victim's property by destroying a part of the front door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. The legal statement of the K witness K (limited to Defendant B);

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant B.