Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has engaged in waste recycling business, etc. under the trade name of “B.”

No person shall dispose of wastes in any place other than those prepared by a Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a head of a Gun/Gu, a park, or a road manager for the collection of wastes.

On January 2017, the Defendant, along with the disposal costs from “C”, a waste disposal business entity (hereinafter “C”), deposited approximately 250 tons of waste synthetic resin, which is a commercial waste, in “B” factory located in Gu and Si/Gu, and entrusted the disposal of waste to “E” of a waste disposal business entity in Youngcheon-si.

The report was made to the Gu, the Si, the Si, and the Gu.

Nevertheless, in order to save the above disposal costs, the Defendant neglected the transfer of approximately 250 tons of the waste synthetic resin (hereinafter “the instant waste”) to G’s factory located in Gyeong-gun F in Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, thereby dumping it without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, J, and K;

1. Each statement of I, J, or K in the police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning H, J, K, I, and L;

1. A written confirmation of preparation of the I and a written public official in charge;

1. On-site photographs, certificates of report on the person discharging industrial wastes, real estate lease contracts, notes, real estate sales contracts, agreements on the payment of balance, etc., G Waste Permit certificates of a stock company, and the circumstances supporting the Defendant’s act of dumping certified copies of registers and criminal intent [the Defendant’s act of dumping] The actual operation of H, a stock company G, in an investigative agency and this court, refers to a concern about whether the Defendant immediately brought about the waste in a factory without permission.

and several times, “The Defendant was not related to himself/herself in receipt of the foregoing claim”, and “The Defendant had no relation to himself/herself.

one consistently stated that the Defendant was “no other person,” and the Defendant was actually a partner.

J and K together with H on April 30, 2017, “H on May 15, 2017.”