logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.07.06 2017가단30527
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 53,984,510 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 19, 2016 to July 6, 2018.

Reasons

(b) the same reference.

Ⅲ Special specifications

8. Delivery of goods;

A. The frequency range of Category D radio frequencies from 1MHz to 6GHz detection and non-locationable radio frequencies should not exist, and the reader detection server or management end and the network chain of D should be able to detect D’s identity at the time of the sub-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de- 50kHz within 10dB, and the integrated control of D installed in various places subject to integrated control of co-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de

It is possible to reproduce the voice and image detected, so that it can be verified (repercing).

(b) Software of control software servers for control software control at least I operating systems of at least one operating system of at least 2 networks GGB support database of at least 300GB*, which is required for the items of control servers (including DM)-based proteon 1 Xeon 6 Core 2GHz at least 4GHB 300 GB *

D. On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied C to B and completed the examination.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the contract amount of KRW 53,984,510 under the contract of this case and damages for delay at each rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment, which is the date of the judgment of this case that it is reasonable for the defendant to dispute as to the existence and scope of the obligation to perform the contract of this case from August 19, 2016.

The plaintiff shall pay damages for delay from January 29, 2016, which is the date of delivery completion.

arrow