1. The defendant shall receive KRW 576,00,000 from the plaintiff, and at the same time, shall be as stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

Recognizing the determination as to the cause of the claim, the terms and conditions of the contract for real estate sales - the purchase price of KRW 640,000,000 - the down payment of KRW 64,00,000 - the remainder of KRW 576,00,000 shall be paid on June 7, 2016.

Article 2 The seller shall deliver all documents necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership to the buyer simultaneously with the receipt of the balance of the purchase price, and shall cooperate in the registration procedure, and the delivery date of the said real estate shall be June 7, 2016.

This transaction shall be established when the contract deposit is paid to the seller of the passbook.

On April 8, 2016, the non-party C, the husband of the plaintiff Eul (the plaintiff Eul) on April 8, 2016, prepared a sales contract (the evidence No. 2, hereinafter referred to as "the contract of this case", and the contract of this case entered into by which the plaintiff was the buyer on the land of this case with the defendant on April 8, 2016, and the main contents thereof are as follows.

On April 11, 2016, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 64,00,000,000, which is three days after the date of the instant contract.

[Reasons for recognition] No. 2 (In full view of the testimony of the witness C and the purport of the entire argument of the defendant, the non-party D, at the time of preparing the contract of this case, can be recognized as having affixed seals to the defendant's name and affixed them on the side of the defendant's name at the time when the plaintiff's agent prepares the contract of this case. According to this, D appears to have affixed only the seals to the contract of this case under the legitimate authority granted by the defendant. Accordingly, since the establishment of the part of the defendant's seal imprint was recognized, it is presumed that the authenticity of the evidence No. 2 is presumed to have been established), the witness's testimony, the result of examining the defendant's identity, the whole purport of the argument, and the purport of judgment of the parties to the contract of this case as a whole, as to whom the actor or the title holder is a party to the contract of this case,