Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for each of six months, for each of six months.

However, the defendant C is subject to objection.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The actual business owner of “E Game Chapter” in Ansan-si, Defendant C, a person who goes to work in the game room and manages the game room in so-called so-called “B president,” Defendant B, a person who was an employee in charge of exchange, and the Defendants, a person who was an employee in charge of exchange, operated the above game room and carried out a business of exchanging the points acquired by customers in cash, and Defendant C received KRW 70,000 per day and 150,000 per day and conspired to obtain the remainder by Defendant A.

No one shall make a business exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, from February 13, 2018 to February 22, 2018, exchanged in cash after deducting 10% from commission fees by converting the scores obtained by an unspecified number of customers visiting the game room using the “F” game machine installed therein from the said “E Game site” to KRW 10,000 per unit.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with respect to G (tentative name);

1. A report on internal investigation (in the form of a game room and a photograph of custody), internal investigation report (in the form of a new registration for a game room attached), investigation report (in the form of a real estate lease contract and a certificate of registration of a juvenile game providing business operator);

1. Application of present Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 3 and 4, seized evidence;

1. In light of the facts charged, Article 44(1)2, Article 32(1)1, and Article 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act applicable to the statement of indictment against Defendant C of the pertinent criminal facts, the phrase “Article 44(1)2, and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry” is deemed to be a clerical error in Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act.

The Defendants are selected from the punishment.