The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is deemed unfair because the defendant, not a handler, trades, administers, sells, or smokes marijuana over several occasions, and the quality of the crime is not good. Considering the type and frequency of the crime handled by the defendant, other age, sexual conduct and environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 364(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the “1. Interrogation protocol of the prosecution against the Defendant, F, and J” is a clerical error in the interrogation protocol of the prosecution against the Defendant, a copy of the interrogation protocol of the prosecution against F, and a copy of the interrogation protocol of the prosecution against H, since it is evident that the “1. Interrogation protocol of the prosecution against the Defendant,” and it is correct under Article 25(1) of