logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고단528
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B and C.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) on September 25, 2016, the Defendant: (b) 01:10 on September 25, 2016, went to a singing room located in Daegu Suwon-gu E; (c) and (d) the Victim G, who was another customer, around the seat of the singer, was changed to the other customer.

The head was booming the victim's cocon part, booming the bat, and bating the bat with his hand.

As a result, the defendant suffered damage to the victim's reputation that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person who was engaged in Finging with the foregoing A’s first class.

At around 01:25 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took the instant G’s portable phone in shooting the site; (b) the police officer of the Daegu Suwon Police Station, who received a report under the foregoing paragraph 1, called the Defendant to return the said G’s portable phone to the Defendant; and (c) took the police officer I’s bath to see, on his hand, the Defendant: (a) carried the relevant G’s flaps; and (b) carried the flaps.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

3. Defendant C: (a) reported the date and time, place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2; (b) the process of Defendant C arrested Defendant B on the grounds stated in the preceding paragraph by a police officer; and (c) expressed to the police officer I belonging to the Suwon Police Station H District; and (d) expressed to the same J that “I and the same police officer, who sent the flasing fe in the febb head few few few, and carried the said police officer several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant A, each of the defendant B and C (as at the second trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to K;

1. Each police statement made to I, J and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim's photograph, the place of work in each H District, the department related to the report of the case 112, the investigation report of the case, and the investigation report of the case (attached to the Fing-sing CCTV CD and the screen screen by capturing);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow