(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.17 2017고단549

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.05.17 2017고단549

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 2, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) placed a card to the owner of the business in order to calculate the remaining drinking value by returning home and then, (b) placed the card to the owner of the business in order to pay for the remaining drinking value by returning home in the first place; and (c) did not settle the payment due to the shortage of the balance to the owner of the business.

It is the manager of building management.

The money did not pay the drinking value, such as "nicking in mind," because there was no money.

22:10 on the same day, at the entrance and exit of the above main station, after receiving a report from 112 on the existence of a person who was in charge of the foregoing main station at the 10th day, the police box belonging to the Seoul Dobong-gu Police Station Down Police Station E, who was called out, prevented the Defendant and the employer from paying expenses for the value of the liquor; and

C. During the breathic theory such as C. E, the body of E was tightly sealed by two descendants, and the E was tightly pushed off by bad hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reporting operations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The sentence of imprisonment is selected in light of the following: (a) a police officer, who solicits a police officer to return home with the alcohol value of the reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) a police officer, who commits a crime against his/her own mistake; (c) a defendant reflects his/her mistake; (d) a defendant has no record of the same kind of crime; and (e) other conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, such as

참조조문

-형법 제62조 제1항

-형법 제136조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.11.01 2018고단603

-서울동부지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단3295

-광주지방법원 2018.04.06 2017고단5604

-수원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단8239

-서울북부지방법원 2016.06.22 2016고단1672